In recent years, there have been several articles published by Reuters that have misrepresented the personal and professional life of Levi Sap Nei Thang. We feel compelled to address these inaccuracies and set the record straight. It is disheartening to witness the spread of false information, especially from a news outlet that Levi once held in high regard.
One particular instance that stands out is the discrepancy in Levi Sap Nei Thang’s social media following. While Reuters reported on 8 January 2024, Facebook followers of Levi Sap Nei Thang were 125,000, the truth is that Levi Sap Nei Thang has amassed over 700,000 followers over the past five years. This significant difference in numbers raises concerns about the accuracy of their reporting.
Additionally, Reuters made errors regarding the extent of the ownership of Levi Sap Nei Thang in oil leases. In their articles from 2020-2021, they claimed Levi Sap Nei Thang owned 133,000 acres, which is an underestimation. In reality, Levi Sap Nei Thang’s ownership extends beyond that figure.
Furthermore, the reported expenses associated with the oil leases were also incorrect. Reuters initially stated that Levi Sap Nei Thang spent 3.7 million, and later revised it to 3.5 million, both of which are inaccurate.
Another misleading claim made by Reuters is that Levi Sap Nei Thang engaged in deceptive practices when selling the oil leases to the Burmese people. We want to clarify that Levi Sap Nei Thang did not know the buyers personally prior to the transaction. The sale was conducted in a fair and transparent manner, with major American oil companies being the purchasers. Allegations of coercion or deceit are unfounded.
Regarding promises to drill oil as reported by Reuter, it is important to clarify that these claims are baseless and false. There is no evidence and no proof of this claim. Levi Sap Nei Thang has categorically stated that she bears no responsibility and has no involvement with the buyers after selling the leases. While she values friendship, it is contingent upon the buyers meeting her standards. If someone is a troublemaker, she does not require their money and kindly requests them not to approach her.
Furthermore, it has come to our attention that Reuters conducted interviews with supposed customers of Levi Sap Nei Thang. However, the information gathered from these interviews is completely erroneous. The individuals interviewed have provided misleading statements that do not align with the truth.
The reports in Reuters have inaccurately implicated Levi Sap Nei Thang and her companies. The false information has been used by 21 people and sued Levi Sap Nei Thang and her companies. These allegations are baseless and lack any substantiating evidence.
It is disappointing to see individuals, including those seeking publicity, attaching themselves to the name Levi Sap Nei Thang in order to gain attention.
However, We will no longer remain silent in the face of these false accusations. Reuters must be held accountable for their inaccurate reporting, and we are prepared to pursue legal action to seek appropriate compensation.